ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Lifeline Interdependency Analysis×Evacuation Time Estimation Modeling×
DziedzinaDisaster StudiesDisaster Studies
RodzinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok powstania20012008
TwórcaSteven M. Rinaldi, James P. Peerenboom & Terrence K. KellyMichael K. Lindell (EMBLEM2); regional evacuation modeling tradition
TypNetwork model of coupled critical-infrastructure systems and cascading failureBehavioral-and-network model of mass evacuation duration
Źródło pierwotneRinaldi, S. M., Peerenboom, J. P., & Kelly, T. K. (2001). Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 21(6), 11-25. DOI ↗Lindell, M. K. (2008). EMBLEM2: An empirically based large scale evacuation time estimate model. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(1), 140-154. DOI ↗
Inne nazwyCritical Infrastructure Interdependency Analysis, Infrastructure Interdependency Modeling, Lifeline Network AnalysisEvacuation Time Estimate Modeling, ETE Modeling, Mass Evacuation Modeling
Pokrewne33
PodsumowanieLifeline interdependency analysis studies how critical infrastructure systems — power, water, natural gas, telecommunications, and transportation — depend on one another, so that a disaster striking one can cascade into others. The foundational framework, set out by Steven Rinaldi, James Peerenboom, and Terrence Kelly in 2001, classifies the couplings among infrastructures into physical, cyber, geographic, and logical interdependencies and characterizes how disruptions propagate across them. Modeled as coupled networks, the lifelines and their dependency links allow analysts to simulate cascading failure: a power outage stops water pumping and telecommunications, transport disruption delays restoration, and feedbacks amplify the impact. The analysis estimates the system-wide consequences of disruptions and informs restoration sequencing, making it central to understanding why disasters disable far more than the directly damaged components and to planning resilient, recoverable infrastructure.Evacuation time estimate (ETE) modeling predicts how long it will take to move an at-risk population to safety, a quantity central to emergency planning for hurricanes, floods, wildfires, nuclear plants, and other hazards. The method joins two ingredients: a behavioral component describing when households decide to leave — the mobilization or 'loading' curve, grounded in warning-response research such as the Protective Action Decision Model — and a transportation component describing how fast the road network can carry them away. Michael Lindell's EMBLEM2 exemplifies the empirically based approach, letting emergency managers compute ETEs from a modest set of route, behavioral, and scope parameters and even update them in real time as a hazard approaches. By combining human departure timing with network capacity, ETE modeling tells planners when to issue evacuation orders and where congestion will bind, turning evacuation from guesswork into quantified logistics.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Lifeline Interdependency Analysis · Evacuation Time Estimation Modeling. Pobrano 2026-06-24 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare