Porównaj metody

	Intersectionality Analysis	Krytyczna analiza dyskursu
Dziedzina	Gender Studies	Metody jakościowe
Rodzina	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Rok powstania	1989	Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
Twórca	Kimberlé Crenshaw	Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
Typ	Critical qualitative analytic framework	Qualitative research method
Źródło pierwotne	Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.	Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press.
Inne nazwy	Intersectional Analysis, Intersectionality Framework, Intersectional Qualitative Analysis	CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
Pokrewne	4	6
Podsumowanie	Intersectionality analysis is a critical qualitative framework that examines how multiple social categories — such as race, gender, class, sexuality, and disability — intersect and operate together to shape lived experience, advantage, and disadvantage. Coined by legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989 and 1991, it rejects single-axis analysis that treats categories one at a time, insisting instead that overlapping systems of power produce qualitatively distinct positions that cannot be understood by adding the categories separately.	Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.