Porównaj metody

	Interpretive conversation analysis	Analiza tematyczna
Dziedzina	Metody jakościowe	Badania jakościowe
Rodzina	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Rok powstania	1960s–1970s (CA); interpretive strand formalised 1990s–2000s	2006
Twórca	Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (CA foundations); interpretive extension by discourse scholars including Margaret Wetherell	Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
Typ	Qualitative discourse research design	Method
Źródło pierwotne	ten Have, P. (2007). Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412922271	Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Inne nazwy	ICA, interpretive CA, hermeneutic conversation analysis, qualitative conversation analysis	TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
Pokrewne	6	3
Podsumowanie	Interpretive conversation analysis (ICA) examines how meaning is co-constructed turn by turn in talk, combining the micro-sequential rigour of classic conversation analysis with an explicitly interpretive stance. Rather than treating sequential organisation as the sole analytic object, ICA asks what participants are doing socially and discursively through their turns — what identities, institutional agendas, and power relations are built and contested in interaction. It draws on naturally occurring or recorded talk from social, institutional, or interview settings.	Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.