Porównaj metody

	Analiza międzykulturowa HRAF	Liczba zidentyfikowanych okazów
Dziedzina	Archeologia	Archeologia
Rodzina	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Rok powstania	1967	1971
Twórca	George Murdock	R. E. Chaplin
Typ	Ethnographic comparison	Faunal quantification method
Źródło pierwotne	Murdock, G. P. (1967). Ethnographic Atlas. University of Pittsburgh Press.	Chaplin, R. E. (1971). The Study of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites. Seminar Press.
Inne nazwy	cross-cultural comparison, comparative ethnography	NISP method, specimen count
Pokrewne	2	4
Podsumowanie	HRAF (Human Relations Area Files) cross-cultural analysis compares ethnographic data from diverse societies to identify patterns and test hypotheses about human social organization and cultural practices. Developed by George Murdock and colleagues, the method uses a standardized database of ethnographic information coded for comparative analysis. HRAF provides a framework for systematic cross-cultural comparison, helping archaeologists interpret prehistoric patterns through ethnographic analogy.	Number of identified specimens (NISP) is a fundamental zooarchaeological method that quantifies the abundance of faunal remains by counting all identifiable bone fragments or specimens in an assemblage. Formalized by R. E. Chaplin and later refined by Donald Grayson and others, NISP is the most straightforward and widely used quantification metric in zooarchaeology. Despite its simplicity, NISP is sensitive to both cultural and taphonomic factors that affect preservation, fragmentation, and identification of bone assemblages.