ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Badania fokusowe×Wywiad pogłębiony×Wywiad częściowo ustrukturyzowany×
DziedzinaMetody jakościoweMetody jakościoweMetody jakościowe
RodzinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok powstania1940s (sociological origin); modern applied form from the 1980s–1990sMid-20th century (formalised in qualitative social research from the 1950s onward)1946 (Merton & Kendall); codified as a standard method through the 1980s–1990s
TwórcaRobert K. Merton (sociological precursor, 1940s); popularised in applied research by Richard A. KruegerRooted in sociological interviewing traditions; systematised by researchers including Steinar Kvale and Herbert J. RubinRobert K. Merton and Patricia Kendall (focused interview, 1946); further systematised by Steinar Kvale
TypQualitative data collection methodQualitative research methodQualitative research method
Źródło pierwotneKrueger, R.A. & Casey, M.A. (2014). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483365244Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803958203Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761925422
Inne nazwyfocus group discussion, FGD, group interview, Odak Grup AraştırmasıIDI, semi-structured interview, unstructured interview, qualitative interviewguided interview, semi-standardized interview, focused interview, SSI
Pokrewne666
PodsumowanieFocus group research is a qualitative data-collection method in which a trained moderator guides structured discussions with homogeneous groups of six to ten participants to explore ideas, attitudes, and perceptions on a defined topic. Developed from sociological roots in the 1940s and systematised for applied research by Krueger and Casey, the method leverages group interaction as a data source — revealing not just what people think, but how they negotiate and articulate views in a social setting.The in-depth interview is a one-to-one qualitative data-collection method in which a researcher engages a participant in an extended, open-ended conversation to elicit rich, detailed accounts of experiences, perceptions, beliefs, or meanings. Unlike structured surveys, the interview guide serves as a flexible road map rather than a fixed script, allowing the researcher to probe unexpected directions as they emerge. The approach is foundational to qualitative inquiry and is used directly as a primary method or as the data-collection arm of phenomenology, grounded theory, narrative analysis, and other frameworks.The semi-structured interview is a qualitative data-collection method in which the researcher prepares a set of key questions or topic areas in advance but remains free to probe, follow up, and reorder as the conversation evolves. Unlike structured interviews — which fix every question and sequence — or unstructured interviews — which are entirely open — the semi-structured format balances comparability across participants with the flexibility needed to capture the depth and nuance of individual perspectives. It is the most widely used interview format in social science, health, and education research.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 1 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Focus Group · In-Depth Interview · Semi-Structured Interview. Pobrano 2026-06-18 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare