ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Fire Danger Rating System×Rainfall-Runoff Modeling×
DziedzinaDisaster StudiesDisaster Studies
RodzinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok powstania19771979
TwórcaJohn E. Deeming, Robert E. Burgan & Jack D. Cohen (US NFDRS); C. E. Van Wagner (Canadian FWI System)Keith J. Beven (Primer; TOPMODEL with M. J. Kirkby)
TypOperational fuel-moisture and fire-behavior index pipelineProcess-based hydrologic simulation pipeline
Źródło pierwotneDeeming, J. E., Burgan, R. E., & Cohen, J. D. (1977). The National Fire-Danger Rating System — 1978. General Technical Report INT-39, USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT, 63 p. link ↗Beven, K. J. (2012). Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: The Primer (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester. ISBN: 9780470714591
Inne nazwyWildland Fire Danger Rating, National Fire-Danger Rating System (NFDRS), Fire Danger Indices, Operational Fire Danger AssessmentHydrological Modeling, Watershed Runoff Simulation, Catchment Hydrologic Modeling, Conceptual Rainfall-Runoff Models
Pokrewne23
PodsumowanieA fire danger rating system converts daily weather, fuel, and topography information into operational indices that summarize how easily wildfires will ignite, spread, and burn intensely. Two systems dominate worldwide practice: the U.S. National Fire-Danger Rating System (NFDRS), documented by Deeming, Burgan, and Cohen, and the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index (FWI) System, whose structure Van Wagner formalized in 1987. Both begin by tracking the moisture content of fuels of different sizes — fine fuels respond to weather within hours, while heavy logs and deep duff respond over weeks — and then feed these moisture estimates, together with wind and fuel characteristics, through a chain of subindices that estimate rate of spread, fuel consumption, and fire intensity. The end product is a small set of numbers and danger classes (from Low to Extreme) that agencies use to set preparedness levels, issue public warnings, position resources, and impose restrictions.Rainfall-runoff modeling simulates how precipitation falling on a catchment is transformed into streamflow at its outlet, accounting for the water that is intercepted, infiltrated, stored, evaporated, and routed through soils and channels. Models range from simple lumped conceptual stores (such as the unit hydrograph or bucket-type models) to spatially distributed, physically based representations of the catchment. Keith Beven's Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: The Primer is the standard reference, and his and Kirkby's 1979 TOPMODEL — built on a topographic wetness index that predicts where saturated, runoff-generating areas expand — remains one of the most influential conceptual formulations. Because real catchments are heterogeneous and only partly observable, calibration against gauged discharge and explicit treatment of parameter uncertainty (Beven's GLUE framework) are central. The models drive flood forecasting, water-resource planning, and assessment of land-use and climate change.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Fire Danger Rating System · Rainfall-Runoff Modeling. Pobrano 2026-06-24 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare