Porównaj metody

	Analiza dyskursu w oparciu o pole	Krytyczna analiza dyskursu
Dziedzina	Metody jakościowe	Metody jakościowe
Rodzina	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Rok powstania	1980s–1990s	Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
Twórca	Synthesised from Pierre Bourdieu's field theory and discourse analysis; systematised by researchers including John Frow	Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
Typ	Qualitative analytical framework	Qualitative research method
Źródło pierwotne	Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press. ISBN: 978-0674510302	Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press.
Inne nazwy	field discourse analysis, Bourdieusian discourse analysis, sociological discourse analysis, FDA	CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
Pokrewne	6	6
Podsumowanie	Field-based discourse analysis integrates Pierre Bourdieu's sociological concept of the field — a structured social space of positions, capital, and struggle — with the close textual methods of discourse analysis. Rather than treating language as a neutral medium, it examines how discourse is produced, circulated, and received within specific social fields (education, law, journalism, science, etc.), and how discursive choices reflect and reproduce the distribution of power and capital within those fields.	Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.