Porównaj metody

	Feminist Discourse Analysis	Intersectionality Analysis
Dziedzina	Gender Studies	Gender Studies
Rodzina	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Rok powstania	2005	1989
Twórca	Michelle M. Lazar	Kimberlé Crenshaw
Typ	Critical feminist discourse-analytic method	Critical qualitative analytic framework
Źródło pierwotne	Lazar, M. M. (2007). Feminist critical discourse analysis: Articulating a feminist discourse praxis. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(2), 141–164.	Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
Inne nazwy	Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis, FCDA, Feminist CDA	Intersectional Analysis, Intersectionality Framework, Intersectional Qualitative Analysis
Pokrewne	4	4
Podsumowanie	Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis (FCDA) extends critical discourse analysis with an explicit feminist politics, examining how gender ideology and asymmetric power relations between women and men are produced, sustained, contested, and above all naturalized in texts and talk. Articulated by Michelle Lazar in her 2005 edited collection and 2007 programmatic article, it combines the close linguistic analysis of the CDA tradition with feminist theory to expose the often subtle, taken-for-granted sexism through which patriarchal arrangements come to seem ordinary and commonsensical.	Intersectionality analysis is a critical qualitative framework that examines how multiple social categories — such as race, gender, class, sexuality, and disability — intersect and operate together to shape lived experience, advantage, and disadvantage. Coined by legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989 and 1991, it rejects single-axis analysis that treats categories one at a time, insisting instead that overlapping systems of power produce qualitatively distinct positions that cannot be understood by adding the categories separately.