Porównaj metody

	Faceted Classification Design	Literary Warrant Analysis
Dziedzina	Library Information Science	Library Information Science
Rodzina	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Rok powstania	1960	1995
Twórca	Brian C. Vickery (Classification Research Group); S. R. Ranganathan	E. Wyndham Hulme (concept, 1911); Clare Beghtol (operationalization, 1995)
Typ	Constructive pipeline for building a faceted classification scheme	Corpus-based pipeline for justifying classes and terms
Źródło pierwotne	Vickery, B. C. (1960). Faceted Classification: A Guide to Construction and Use of Special Schemes. London: Aslib. ISBN: 9780851420103	Beghtol, C. (1995). Domain analysis, literary warrant, and consensus: The case of fiction studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(1), 30-44.
Inne nazwy	Faceted Scheme Construction, Special Faceted Classification Design, Analytico-Synthetic Scheme Design, Facet Scheme Engineering	Warrant Analysis, Literary Warrant Study, Bibliographic Warrant Analysis, Corpus-Based Warrant Analysis
Pokrewne	3	3
Podsumowanie	Faceted classification design is the constructive engineering of a complete analytico-synthetic scheme for a subject field, turning the conceptual technique of facet analysis into a working classification with facets, ordered arrays, a citation order, and notation. The methodology was codified by Brian Vickery for the British Classification Research Group in his 1960 guide to constructing special schemes, building on S. R. Ranganathan's theory of analytico-synthetic classification. Where facet analysis decomposes subjects into fundamental dimensions, faceted classification design assembles those dimensions into a usable, hospitable, and notation-bearing system, and then tests it against real documents. The result is a scheme that classifies compound subjects by synthesis, grows gracefully as a field expands, and underpins both shelf classification and modern faceted navigation.	Literary warrant analysis is the method of justifying the classes and terms of a knowledge-organization system by reference to the actual content of a domain's published literature, rather than to abstract logic or a designer's intuition. The principle, traceable to E. Wyndham Hulme's 1911 idea that classification should be warranted by the books that exist, was given an empirical, corpus-based operationalization by Clare Beghtol in her study of fiction studies, where she used subject descriptors in a bibliographic database to quantify how strongly the domain's literature supported particular concepts and where the field reached consensus. Within Hjørland and Albrechtsen's domain-analysis programme, literary warrant is the empirical anchor that ties a classification or thesaurus to the discourse it serves. The analysis assembles a representative corpus, extracts and counts concepts, measures their warrant, gauges consensus, and lets that evidence determine what the system should contain and how finely it should distinguish.