Porównaj metody
Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.
| Model sieci losowych o wykładniczym rozkładzie (ERGM / p*)× | Wykrywanie społeczności× | |
|---|---|---|
| Dziedzina | Analiza sieci | Analiza sieci |
| Rodzina | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Rok powstania≠ | 1986 (foundational); modern ERGM framework 1996–2007 | 2002–2019 (algorithm family) |
| Twórca≠ | Frank & Strauss (1986); extended by Wasserman & Pattison (1996) and Robins et al. (2007) | Louvain: Blondel et al. (2008); Leiden: Traag et al. (2019); Girvan-Newman: Girvan & Newman (2002); Infomap: Rosvall & Bergstrom (2008) |
| Typ≠ | Probabilistic generative network model | Graph-partitioning / clustering algorithm family |
| Źródło pierwotne≠ | Robins, G., Pattison, P., Kalish, Y., & Lusher, D. (2007). An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks, 29(2), 173-191. DOI ↗ | Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R. & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast Unfolding of Communities in Large Networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics, 2008(10), P10008. DOI ↗ |
| Inne nazwy≠ | ERGM, p-star model, p* model, Üstel Rastgele Graf Modeli (ERGM / p*) | graph clustering, network partitioning, Topluluk Tespiti (Louvain, Girvan-Newman, Leiden) |
| Pokrewne≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Podsumowanie≠ | The Exponential Random Graph Model (ERGM), also known as the p* model, is a statistical framework for network analysis that models the probability of an observed network as a function of its local structural features — such as reciprocity, triangles, and degree distribution. Developed from the foundational work of Frank and Strauss (1986) and extended into the modern framework by Wasserman and Pattison (1996) and Robins et al. (2007), ERGM is the inferential standard for social network analysis, capable of testing whether observed network structures arise by chance or reflect genuine social processes. | Community detection is a family of graph-partitioning algorithms that discover densely connected sub-groups — communities — within a network. First formalised through the modularity measure by Girvan and Newman (2002), the field advanced rapidly with the Louvain method (Blondel et al., 2008), the Leiden refinement (Traag et al., 2019), and the information-theoretic Infomap approach. All variants answer the same question: which nodes cluster together more tightly among themselves than with the rest of the network? |
| ScholarGateZbiór danych ↗ |
|
|