Porównaj metody
Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.
| Estymator dynamicznego dopasowania× | Ważenie odwrotnością prawdopodobieństwa leczenia (IPW / IPTW)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Dziedzina | Wnioskowanie przyczynowe | Wnioskowanie przyczynowe |
| Rodzina | Regression model | Regression model |
| Rok powstania≠ | 2010 | 2000 |
| Twórca≠ | Lechner & Miquel (2010); building on Heckman, Ichimura & Todd (1998) | Robins, Hernán & Brumback |
| Typ≠ | Nonparametric causal inference / matching | Causal inference weighting estimator |
| Źródło pierwotne≠ | Lechner, M., & Miquel, R. (2010). Identification of the effects of dynamic treatments by sequential conditional independence assumptions. Empirical Economics, 39(1), 111-137. DOI ↗ | Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗ |
| Inne nazwy≠ | dynamic treatment matching, sequential matching estimator, dynamic selection-on-observables, DME | IPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting |
| Pokrewne≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Podsumowanie≠ | The Dynamic Matching Estimator extends standard matching methods to settings where treatment is assigned sequentially over multiple periods. Instead of a single treatment decision, units receive or forgo treatment at each time point, and the estimator identifies causal effects of entire treatment histories by matching on time-varying covariates and past treatment paths, under sequential conditional independence assumptions. | Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias. |
| ScholarGateZbiór danych ↗ |
|
|