Porównaj metody
Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.
| Analiza dyskursu× | Krytyczna analiza dyskursu× | |
|---|---|---|
| Dziedzina≠ | Badania jakościowe | Metody jakościowe |
| Rodzina | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Rok powstania≠ | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) | Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995) |
| Twórca≠ | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell | Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak |
| Typ≠ | Method | Qualitative research method |
| Źródło pierwotne≠ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗ |
| Inne nazwy≠ | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis | CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis |
| Pokrewne≠ | 2 | 6 |
| Podsumowanie≠ | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. | Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions. |
| ScholarGateZbiór danych ↗ |
|
|