Porównaj metody

	Krytyczna Analiza Fenomenologiczno-Interpretatywna	Krytyczna analiza dyskursu
Dziedzina	Metody jakościowe	Metody jakościowe
Rodzina	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Rok powstania	1996 (IPA); critical variant explicitly theorised in the 2000s–2010s	Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
Twórca	Jonathan A. Smith (IPA); critical extension developed within the IPA tradition by Smith, Flowers, Larkin and associated scholars	Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
Typ	Qualitative research design and analytic approach	Qualitative research method
Źródło pierwotne	Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-1412908344	Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press.
Inne nazwy	Critical IPA, CIPA, critical-lens IPA, critical interpretive phenomenology	CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
Pokrewne	5	6
Podsumowanie	Critical Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (Critical IPA) is a qualitative approach that combines the double-hermeneutic interpretive work of standard IPA with an explicit critical lens, examining not only how participants make sense of their experience but also how power, social structures, ideology, and systemic inequalities shape that experience. It retains the ideographic, person-centred rigour of IPA while asking whose interests are served and what is silenced or constrained.	Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.