Porównaj metody
Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.
| COSMIN: Ocena jakości metodologicznej badań nad narzędziami pomiarowymi× | Lista kontrolna CASP dla badań randomizowanych z grupą kontrolną× | |
|---|---|---|
| Dziedzina | Metodologia badań | Metodologia badań |
| Rodzina | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Rok powstania≠ | 2010 | 1993 (updated through 2023) |
| Twórca≠ | Mokkink et al. (COSMIN Group) | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (Oxford, UK) |
| Typ≠ | Measurement instrument evaluation | Clinician-rated / Research team assessment |
| Źródło pierwotne≠ | Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., ... & de Vet, H. C. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549. DOI ↗ | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). (1993, updated). CASP Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist. University of Oxford, UK. www.casp-uk.net link ↗ |
| Inne nazwy≠ | COSMIN | CASP-RCT, CASP |
| Pokrewne | 4 | 4 |
| Podsumowanie≠ | COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) is a systematic framework and 10-item checklist developed by Mokkink et al. (2010) to evaluate the methodological quality of studies that assess the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), questionnaires, and clinical scales. COSMIN guides the development, validation, and selection of health measurement instruments across clinical research and practice. | The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) RCT Checklist is a practical, widely adopted tool developed by the UK-based Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (founded 1993) for assessing the methodological quality and relevance of published randomized controlled trials. Unlike numeric scoring scales, it uses 11 structured questions with yes/no/cannot tell responses to guide critical appraisal in a format accessible to busy clinicians, researchers, and educators. |
| ScholarGateZbiór danych ↗ |
|
|