Porównaj metody

	Corpus Concordance Analysis	Krytyczna analiza dyskursu
Dziedzina	Językoznawstwo	Metody jakościowe
Rodzina	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Rok powstania	1991	Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
Twórca	Corpus linguists (John Sinclair; Paul Baker)	Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
Typ	Corpus-based descriptive analysis of word usage in context	Qualitative research method
Źródło pierwotne	Baker, P. (2006). Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. Continuum. ISBN: 9780826477248	Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press.
Inne nazwy	Concordance Analysis, KWIC Analysis, Keyword-in-Context Analysis	CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
Pokrewne	4	6
Podsumowanie	Corpus concordance analysis is a core corpus-linguistic technique that retrieves every occurrence of a search word or phrase from a large body of machine-readable text and displays them in keyword-in-context (KWIC) format — the target term aligned in a central column with its surrounding co-text. By reading and sorting these lines, analysts uncover the recurrent patterns, collocations, and meanings of words as they are actually used, grounding linguistic claims in attested evidence rather than introspection.	Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.