ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Content Analysis of Treaties×Event Data Analysis of Conflict×
DziedzinaInternational RelationsInternational Relations
RodzinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok powstania20001994
TwórcaKlaus Krippendorff (content analysis methodology); legalization literature (Abbott et al.)Philip Schrodt (KEDS/TABARI); ICEWS team (Boschee et al.)
TypSystematic coding of the text and design features of international agreementsAutomated extraction of structured political events from news text
Źródło pierwotneHayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89. DOI ↗Schrodt, P. A., Davis, S. G., & Weddle, J. L. (1994). Political science: KEDS — A program for the machine coding of event data. Social Science Computer Review, 12(4), 561–588. See also Gerner, Schrodt et al. (1994), Machine coding of event data using regional and international sources, International Studies Quarterly, 38(1), 91–119. DOI ↗
Inne nazwyTreaty Text Analysis, International Agreement Coding, Treaty Design Content Analysis, Legalization Content AnalysisPolitical Event Data, Machine-Coded Conflict Event Data, Conflict Event Extraction, Who-Did-What-to-Whom Event Coding
Pokrewne34
PodsumowanieContent analysis of treaties is the systematic, rule-governed coding of the text and design features of international agreements — their obligations, precision, delegation, enforcement, flexibility, and substantive provisions — to study how treaties are written and what explains variation in their design. It applies the established content-analysis methodology codified by Krippendorff to the specialized vocabulary of international law and institutions, often organized around frameworks such as the legalization concept of Abbott and colleagues (2000).Event data analysis is the automated extraction of structured records of political interactions — who did what to whom, when, and where — from large volumes of news text, for the quantitative study of conflict and cooperation. Pioneered for machine coding by Philip Schrodt with the KEDS and TABARI systems and scaled in projects such as ICEWS and GDELT, it turns unstructured reporting into dated actor-action-target triples coded to an ontology like CAMEO, which can then be aggregated into time series of interstate or intrastate hostility.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Content Analysis of Treaties · Event Data Analysis of Conflict. Pobrano 2026-06-25 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare