Porównaj metody
Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.
| Checklista CONSORT: Standardy raportowania badań kontrolowanych randomizowanych× | Lista kontrolna CASP dla badań randomizowanych z grupą kontrolną× | |
|---|---|---|
| Dziedzina | Metodologia badań | Metodologia badań |
| Rodzina | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Rok powstania≠ | 2010 (original 1996) | 1993 (updated through 2023) |
| Twórca≠ | Schulz et al. (CONSORT Group) | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (Oxford, UK) |
| Typ≠ | Trial author reporting checklist | Clinician-rated / Research team assessment |
| Źródło pierwotne≠ | Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. The Lancet, 375(9721), 1657–1668. DOI ↗ | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). (1993, updated). CASP Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist. University of Oxford, UK. www.casp-uk.net link ↗ |
| Inne nazwy | CONSORT, CONSORT 2010 | CASP-RCT, CASP |
| Pokrewne | 4 | 4 |
| Podsumowanie≠ | The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement is a 25-item evidence-based checklist and flow diagram developed to standardize reporting of parallel-group randomized controlled trials. First published in 1996 and updated in 2010 (CONSORT 2010), it is endorsed by over 600 journals including The Lancet, JAMA, and BMJ, and is mandatory or strongly recommended for RCT manuscript submission across clinical research. | The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) RCT Checklist is a practical, widely adopted tool developed by the UK-based Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (founded 1993) for assessing the methodological quality and relevance of published randomized controlled trials. Unlike numeric scoring scales, it uses 11 structured questions with yes/no/cannot tell responses to guide critical appraisal in a format accessible to busy clinicians, researchers, and educators. |
| ScholarGateZbiór danych ↗ |
|
|