Porównaj metody
Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.
| Conjoint Survey Experiment× | Analiza conjoint× | |
|---|---|---|
| Dziedzina≠ | Political Science | Planowanie eksperymentów |
| Rodzina≠ | Process / pipeline | Hypothesis test |
| Rok powstania≠ | 2014 | 1978 |
| Twórca≠ | Jens Hainmueller, Daniel Hopkins, Teppei Yamamoto | Paul E. Green & V. Srinivasan |
| Typ≠ | Multi-attribute forced-choice survey experiment with design-based causal estimands | Decomposition-based utility estimation |
| Źródło pierwotne≠ | Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2014). Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments. Political Analysis, 22(1), 1–30. DOI ↗ | Green, P.E. & Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(2), 103–123. DOI ↗ |
| Inne nazwy≠ | Causal conjoint, Forced-choice conjoint experiment, AMCE conjoint, Conjoint experiment | CBC conjoint, choice-based conjoint, adaptive conjoint analysis, full-profile conjoint |
| Pokrewne≠ | 4 | 6 |
| Podsumowanie≠ | A conjoint survey experiment presents respondents with profiles — of candidates, immigrants, policies, or products — described by several attributes whose levels are independently randomized, and asks respondents to choose between or rate the profiles. Hainmueller, Hopkins, and Yamamoto's 2014 framework places this design on a rigorous causal footing, defining the average marginal component effect (AMCE) as the design-based causal effect of an attribute level, averaged over the randomization distribution of all other attributes. It lets political scientists estimate the relative causal weight of many decision factors simultaneously from realistic, multidimensional choices. | Conjoint analysis is a preference-measurement technique that decomposes overall product evaluations into the separate utility values — called part-worths — that respondents assign to each attribute level. Formalised by Green and Srinivasan in their seminal 1978 Journal of Consumer Research paper, the method has become the dominant tool in marketing research and product design for quantifying what buyers truly trade off when they choose between options. |
| ScholarGateZbiór danych ↗ |
|
|