Porównaj metody

	Konflikt interesów w badaniach naukowych	Raport Belmonta
Dziedzina	Etyka badań naukowych	Etyka badań naukowych
Rodzina	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Rok powstania	2013	1979
Twórca	Multiple (NIH, ICMJE, institutional COI policies)	National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (US DHEW)
Typ	Guideline	Framework
Źródło pierwotne	International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2023). Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. ICMJE Recommendations for Manuscript Authorship.	National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
Inne nazwy	COI, Conflicts of Interest	Belmont Principles, Three Ethical Principles
Pokrewne	3	5
Podsumowanie	A conflict of interest (COI) in research exists when a researcher has financial, professional, or personal interests that might bias their research judgment or outcomes. Conflicts are inherent in research communities—researchers often have legitimate stakes in their research's success—but unmanaged conflicts compromise research integrity and public trust. Managing COI requires transparent disclosure, institutional oversight, and proactive mitigation strategies to minimize bias risk while allowing legitimate research to proceed.	The Belmont Report (1979) is the foundational US ethical framework for human subjects research, established by the National Commission following the Tuskegee Syphilis Study scandal. It articulates three core principles—Respect for Persons, Beneficence, and Justice—that form the basis for institutional review and regulatory oversight of human research globally. Every researcher conducting human studies must understand and apply these principles.