ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Etnografia instytucjonalna porównawcza×Porównawcza jakościowa analiza treści×
DziedzinaMetody jakościoweMetody jakościowe
RodzinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok powstania1987 (IE origin); comparative applications developed 1990s–2000s1983 (Mayring's QCA foundation); comparative adaptations prominent from 2000s onward
TwórcaDorothy E. Smith (IE foundation); comparative extension by subsequent IE scholarsPhilipp Mayring (qualitative content analysis); comparative application developed across communication, policy, and social science research
TypQualitative multi-site institutional designQualitative research design and analysis strategy
Źródło pierwotneSmith, D. E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759105508Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Sage. ISBN: 978-0857029201
Inne nazwyCIE, comparative IE, multi-site institutional ethnography, cross-institutional ethnographycomparative QCA, cross-case qualitative content analysis, multi-context qualitative content analysis, comparative interpretive content analysis
Pokrewne54
PodsumowanieComparative Institutional Ethnography (CIE) extends Dorothy Smith's institutional ethnography to two or more institutional settings, revealing how texts, ruling relations, and coordinated work practices operate across different organizational contexts. By holding the standpoint of workers or clients constant while varying the institutional site, CIE exposes both the shared ideological mechanisms and the local divergences that shape everyday experience within institutions such as hospitals, schools, welfare agencies, or courts.Comparative qualitative content analysis (comparative QCA) applies a systematic, category-driven reading of texts or documents across two or more cases, groups, time periods, or cultural contexts, with the explicit goal of identifying similarities, differences, and patterns that emerge from the comparison. It combines the interpretive rigour of qualitative content analysis with a structured comparative logic, making it valuable for cross-national policy research, media studies, and any inquiry that requires principled comparison of meaning across contexts.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Comparative Institutional Ethnography · Comparative Qualitative content analysis. Pobrano 2026-06-18 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare