ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Compactness Index×Urban Form Morphometrics×
DziedzinaUrban StudiesUrban Studies
RodzinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok powstania20102019
TwórcaGeographic shape-analysis tradition (Richardson, Cole; codified by Angel, Parent & Civco)Quantitative urban-morphology tradition; momepy toolkit by Martin Fleischmann
TypGeometric/morphological index of how compact a settlement footprint isSystematic quantitative measurement of urban form across buildings, plots, blocks, and streets
Źródło pierwotneAngel, S., Parent, J., & Civco, D. L. (2010). Ten compactness properties of circles: Measuring shape in geography. The Canadian Geographer, 54(4), 441–461. DOI ↗Fleischmann, M. (2019). momepy: Urban Morphology Measuring Toolkit. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1807. DOI ↗
Inne nazwyShape Compactness Measure, Polsby-Popper Index, Richardson Compactness, Perimeter-Area CompactnessUrban Morphometrics, Quantitative Urban Morphology, Morphometric Analysis of Urban Form, Built-Form Morphometrics
Pokrewne44
PodsumowanieA compactness index measures how compact the shape of a settlement, district, or built-up area is, almost always by comparing it to the circle — the most compact shape enclosing a given area. Classic indices such as the Polsby–Popper or Richardson ratio compare a polygon's area to its perimeter, while more elaborate measures compare interpoint distances or fitted circles, all returning a value of one for a perfect circle and falling toward zero as the shape becomes elongated, indented, or fragmented. Angel, Parent and Civco systematized these into a coherent family by showing that the circle is optimal on ten distinct geometric properties, clarifying which index answers which question.Urban form morphometrics is the systematic, quantitative measurement of the physical form of cities — the dimensions, shapes, spatial arrangement, intensity, and connectivity of buildings, plots, blocks, and streets. Rather than describing morphology in words, it computes hundreds of reproducible numerical characters on each morphological element and its local context, turning the qualitative tradition of urban morphology into a measurable science. The open-source momepy toolkit, introduced by Martin Fleischmann in 2019, standardized this workflow, building a morphological tessellation from building footprints and computing dimension, shape, distribution, intensity, and connectivity characters at scale.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 1 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Compactness Index · Urban Form Morphometrics. Pobrano 2026-06-24 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare