ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Cognitive Diagnostic Modeling×Formative Assessment×
DziedzinaEducationEducation
RodzinaLatent structureProcess / pipeline
Rok powstania20101998
TwórcaTatsuoka; DiBello, Roussos & Stout; Junker & Sijtsma; de la TorreScriven (term); Bloom; Black & Wiliam (modern synthesis)
TypRestricted latent class models for diagnosing mastery of discrete skillsInstructional process using evidence of learning to adapt teaching and feedback
Źródło pierwotneRupp, A. A., Templin, J., & Henson, R. A. (2010). Diagnostic Measurement: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Guilford Press. ISBN: 9781606235270Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. DOI ↗
Inne nazwyCDM, Diagnostic Classification Models, DCM, DINA / G-DINA ModelsAssessment for Learning, Classroom Formative Assessment, Feedback-Based Assessment, Embedded Formative Assessment
Pokrewne44
PodsumowanieCognitive diagnostic models (CDMs), also called diagnostic classification models, are restricted latent class models that report not a single ability score but a profile of which discrete skills or attributes a student has mastered. Each item is linked to the attributes it requires through a Q-matrix, and the model classifies every examinee into one of the possible binary mastery patterns. CDMs answer 'which specific skills does this student lack' rather than 'how much overall ability does this student have,' making them central to fine-grained diagnostic and formative assessment.Formative assessment, or assessment for learning, is the practice of gathering evidence of student understanding during instruction and using it immediately to adjust teaching and to give feedback that moves learning forward. Unlike summative assessment, which measures learning after the fact for grading or accountability, formative assessment is woven into the teaching cycle. Synthesized influentially by Black and Wiliam, it is defined not by the type of instrument but by whether the resulting evidence actually changes subsequent instruction and learning.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Cognitive Diagnostic Modeling · Formative Assessment. Pobrano 2026-06-24 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare