Porównaj metody
Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.
| Cluster Randomized Control Group Experimental Design× | Randomizowane badanie kontrolowane z grupowym doborem próby× | |
|---|---|---|
| Dziedzina | Planowanie eksperymentów | Planowanie eksperymentów |
| Rodzina | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Rok powstania≠ | 1990s (formal methodology development) | 1978–1980s |
| Twórca≠ | Murray, D. M.; Donner, A. and Klar, N. (systematic formalization) | Cornfield (1978); systematised by Donner and colleagues (1980s) |
| Typ | Experimental design | Experimental design |
| Źródło pierwotne | Donner, A., & Klar, N. (2000). Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research. Arnold. ISBN: 978-0340691533 | Donner, A., & Klar, N. (2000). Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research. Arnold. ISBN: 978-0340652978 |
| Inne nazwy | CRCT with control group, group-randomized trial, cluster RCT control group design, community randomized controlled trial | cluster RCT, group-randomized trial, community randomized trial, cluster-randomized experiment |
| Pokrewne≠ | 6 | 4 |
| Podsumowanie≠ | A cluster randomized control group experimental design randomly assigns intact groups (clusters) — such as schools, clinics, or communities — rather than individuals to treatment or control conditions. At least one cluster group receives no active intervention, serving as the control. This design is essential when individual randomization is impractical or contamination between participants in close proximity is likely. | A cluster randomized controlled trial (cluster RCT) is an experimental design in which intact social or organisational groups — such as schools, clinics, villages, or workplaces — are randomly assigned to treatment conditions rather than individual participants. Outcomes are still measured at the individual level, but the unit of randomization is the cluster. This design is essential when an intervention is delivered to whole groups, when there is a risk of contamination between participants in the same setting, or when individual randomization is logistically or ethically impractical. |
| ScholarGateZbiór danych ↗ |
|
|