ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Test oceny wyników przewlekłego zapalenia ucha środkowego – 15 pytań×Inwentarz Korzyści z Glasgow×
DziedzinaOtolaryngologiaOtolaryngologia
RodzinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok powstania20161996
TwórcaAnne G.M. Schilder and colleagues (COMOT working group)Karol Robinson, Sophia Gatehouse, and Gordon G. Browning
TypSelf-reportSelf-report
Źródło pierwotneSchilder, A. G., Su, M. P., Blackshaw, H., Lustig, L. R., & O'Donoghue, G. M. (2016). Chronic Otitis Media Outcome Test-15 (COMOT-15): Development and psychometric evaluation. Otology & Neurotology, 37(9), 1314-1320. link ↗Robinson, K., Gatehouse, S., & Browning, G. G. (1996). Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and treatment. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 105(6), 415-422. DOI ↗
Inne nazwyCOMOT-15GBI
Pokrewne33
PodsumowanieThe Chronic Otitis Media Outcome Test-15 (COMOT-15) is a 15-item patient-reported outcome measure specifically designed to assess the burden and impact of chronic otitis media on health-related quality of life. Developed by Schilder and colleagues (2016), the COMOT-15 measures symptoms (ear discharge, hearing loss, ear pain), hearing function, and psychosocial effects of chronic ear disease. It is the recommended core outcome set for clinical trials and quality improvement programs evaluating chronic otitis media treatment.The Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) is an 18-item self-report questionnaire designed to measure change in health status and general well-being resulting from otolaryngologic intervention (surgery, medical treatment). Unlike generic health-related quality-of-life measures, the GBI is disease-specific, asking patients to compare their post-intervention status to their pre-intervention baseline. Developed by Robinson, Gatehouse, and Browning in 1996, the GBI has become the standard outcome measure for evaluating benefit from ear, nose, and throat surgery and treatment.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 1 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: COMOT-15 · GBI. Pobrano 2026-06-19 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare