Porównaj metody
Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.
| Nawigacyjny przegląd wspomagany bibliometriks× | Przegląd narracyjny× | |
|---|---|---|
| Dziedzina | Naukometria | Naukometria |
| Rodzina | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Rok powstania≠ | 2017 (bibliometrix package); narrative review methodology is older | Pre-20th century practice; peer-reviewed methodological guidance from 2000s onward |
| Twórca≠ | Aria & Cuccurullo (bibliometrix R package); narrative review as a traditional form predates this tool | Traditional academic practice; formalized discussion by Green, Johnson & Adams (2006) |
| Typ≠ | Mixed quantitative-qualitative review methodology | Literature review methodology |
| Źródło pierwotne≠ | Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. DOI ↗ | Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101–117. DOI ↗ |
| Inne nazwy≠ | bibliometrix narrative review, R-bibliometrix narrative synthesis, quantitative-assisted narrative review | traditional review, expert review, unsystematic review, narrative synthesis |
| Pokrewne | 6 | 6 |
| Podsumowanie≠ | A bibliometrix-assisted narrative review combines the quantitative field-mapping capabilities of the bibliometrix R package with the interpretive flexibility of a traditional narrative review. Bibliometric indicators — publication trends, author and country productivity, co-citation networks, keyword co-occurrence — are computed and visualised first to orient the reviewer, then a discursive, thematic narrative synthesises the intellectual content of key sources. The result is a structured yet flexible overview of a field that is more transparent and reproducible than a purely informal narrative. | A narrative review is a broad, author-directed synthesis of published literature on a topic, written to summarize, interpret, and contextualize existing knowledge without following the rigorous, pre-registered search and selection protocols that characterize systematic reviews. It draws on the author's expertise to weave disparate sources into a coherent account that identifies themes, debates, and directions for future research. |
| ScholarGateZbiór danych ↗ |
|
|