ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Benefit Incidence Analysis×Cost-Utility Analysis×
DziedzinaPublic PolicyPublic Policy
RodzinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok powstania20002015
TwórcaPublic-finance and World Bank tradition; codified by Lionel DemeryHealth-economics community; standardised by Drummond and colleagues
TypDistributional analysis of public expenditureEconomic evaluation expressing outcomes in utility-weighted health
Źródło pierwotneDemery, L. (2000). Benefit Incidence: A Practitioner's Guide. Washington, DC: World Bank, Poverty and Social Development Group, Africa Region. link ↗Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, M. J., Claxton, K., Stoddart, G. L., & Torrance, G. W. (2015). Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199665877
Inne nazwyBIA, Benefit Incidence, Expenditure Incidence AnalysisCUA, Cost per QALY Analysis, QALY-Based Economic Evaluation
Pokrewne43
PodsumowanieBenefit incidence analysis (BIA) assesses how the benefits of public spending on services such as education, health and subsidies are distributed across population groups, typically ranked by income or consumption. It combines data on who uses publicly provided services, drawn from household surveys, with the unit cost or subsidy the government provides per user, to estimate how much of total public spending each group captures. The result reveals whether public expenditure is progressive — favouring the poor — or regressive, and is a standard tool for analysing the distributional fairness of fiscal policy.Cost-utility analysis (CUA) is a form of economic evaluation that compares the costs of alternative interventions with their outcomes expressed in a common, preference-based measure of health — most often the quality-adjusted life year (QALY), or in global health the disability-adjusted life year (DALY). By combining length and quality of life into a single index, CUA allows interventions with very different effects to be compared on a like-for-like basis, and it produces an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio expressed as cost per QALY gained. It is the dominant method for informing decisions about which health technologies and programs to fund.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 1 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Benefit Incidence Analysis · Cost-Utility Analysis. Pobrano 2026-06-24 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare