Porównaj metody
Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.
| Raport Belmonta× | Zasady integralności badań naukowych× | |
|---|---|---|
| Dziedzina | Etyka badań naukowych | Etyka badań naukowych |
| Rodzina | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Rok powstania≠ | 1979 | 2007 |
| Twórca≠ | National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (US DHEW) | Multiple (National Academies, NIH/ORI, ESOMAR, individual discipline standards) |
| Typ | Framework | Framework |
| Źródło pierwotne≠ | National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. link ↗ | National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Fostering Integrity in Research. The National Academies Press. DOI ↗ |
| Inne nazwy≠ | Belmont Principles, Three Ethical Principles | Responsible Conduct of Research, RCR, Research Ethics Standards |
| Pokrewne≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Podsumowanie≠ | The Belmont Report (1979) is the foundational US ethical framework for human subjects research, established by the National Commission following the Tuskegee Syphilis Study scandal. It articulates three core principles—Respect for Persons, Beneficence, and Justice—that form the basis for institutional review and regulatory oversight of human research globally. Every researcher conducting human studies must understand and apply these principles. | Research integrity encompasses the ethical and professional standards that guide responsible conduct in all aspects of research—from study design and data collection through analysis, reporting, and publication. The core principles—honesty, transparency, accountability, respect, and stewardship—ensure that research is trustworthy, reproducible, and contributes legitimate knowledge. These principles are universal across disciplines and are enforced through institutional policies, professional standards, and regulatory oversight. Violations of research integrity undermine scientific credibility and can harm subjects, institutions, and public trust. |
| ScholarGateZbiór danych ↗ |
|
|