Porównaj metody
Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.
| Anticipatory Governance Analysis× | Multi-Level Perspective on Transitions× | |
|---|---|---|
| Dziedzina | Science Technology Studies | Science Technology Studies |
| Rodzina | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Rok powstania≠ | 2008 | 2002 |
| Twórca≠ | David H. Guston, Daniel Barben, Erik Fisher, Cynthia Selin | Frank W. Geels (building on Arie Rip and René Kemp) |
| Typ≠ | Governance framework and analytic approach for emerging technologies | Conceptual framework and analytic method for sociotechnical change |
| Źródło pierwotne≠ | Guston, D. H. (2014). Understanding 'anticipatory governance'. Social Studies of Science, 44(2), 218-242. DOI ↗ | Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274. DOI ↗ |
| Inne nazwy | Anticipatory governance framework, Foresight-engagement-integration analysis, Reflexive technology governance | MLP, Multi-level perspective framework, Sociotechnical transitions analysis |
| Pokrewne | 4 | 4 |
| Podsumowanie≠ | Anticipatory governance is a framework for steering emerging technologies—nanotechnology, synthetic biology, AI—while their trajectories are still open, rather than waiting to react to harms after they have hardened. Developed by David Guston and colleagues at the Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University, it defines anticipatory governance as a broad societal capacity, distributed across the research enterprise and the public, built from three intertwined components: foresight, public engagement, and integration. The aim is not to predict the future but to build the reflexive capacity to imagine plausible futures and act on them wisely in the present. | The Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) is a middle-range framework for analysing how large sociotechnical systems—energy, mobility, food, water—shift from one dominant configuration to another. It locates change in the interplay of three analytic levels: protected niches where radical novelties incubate, the incumbent sociotechnical regime that structures ordinary practice, and a slow-moving exogenous landscape. Transitions occur when landscape pressures destabilise the regime and open windows of opportunity for maturing niche innovations to break through. |
| ScholarGateZbiór danych ↗ |
|
|