Gå til innholdScholarGate
BibliotekMitt bibliotekPultenReview StudioAssistent
Logg inn
NBD-Dirichlet Model/Bevis
Metodebevisregister

NBD-Dirichlet Model

The NBD-Dirichlet model is the canonical stochastic model of repeat buying and brand choice in stationary, competitive consumer-goods markets. Introduced by Gerald Goodhardt, Andrew Ehrenberg and Christopher Chatfield in their 1984 Journal of the Royal Statistical Society paper "The Dirichlet," it integrates two processes: how often households buy in a product category, modeled by the negative binomial distribution (NBD), and how those purchases are split across competing brands, modeled by a multinomial-Dirichlet process. From just a few parameters, the model reproduces a remarkably wide set of empirical regularities, including each brand's penetration (how many people buy it), its buyers' purchase frequency, repeat-purchase rates, the share of category requirements each brand earns, and the duplication of purchase between brands. The model encodes Ehrenberg's classic 'laws' of buying behavior, most famously double jeopardy, whereby small brands suffer twice over by having both fewer buyers and slightly less loyal buyers. It assumes a stationary, non-partitioned market with brand choice that looks like sampling 'as if from an urn,' and it serves as a benchmark of what normal, no-loyalty-segmentation buying looks like, against which deviations such as genuine partitioning or excess loyalty can be detected.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Kilderegister

Siteringer kopiert ordrett fra metodens kilderegister. Ingen påstandsnivåverifisering er underforstått fra dem.

NBD-Dirichlet Model of Repeat Buying and Brand Choice
Taksonomisk metoderegister · regression-model / marketing
  • Goodhardt, G. J., Ehrenberg, A. S. C., & Chatfield, C. (1984). The Dirichlet: A Comprehensive Model of Buying Behaviour. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 147(5), 621-655. · DOI 10.2307/2981696
Åpne full metode

Kuraterte påstander

Påstander lagret i bevishovedboken, hver med sin egen vurdering.

Ingen kuraterte påstander ennå

Denne visningen finner ikke opp en påstandsvurdering når hovedboken ikke har noen.

Relaterte metoder

Generert fra metodegrafen og vist som maskinforslåtte relasjoner – ingen bevispåstand er underforstått.

Same method familyBG/NBD Modelmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainCustomer Lifetime Valuemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainRFM Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainShare of Wallet Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Bevisstatus

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Kilder

1 registrert sitering, kopiert fra metodens kilderegister.

Handlinger

Åpne metodeside
ScholarGate

Et innholdsfokusert oppslagsbibliotek for forskningsmetoder — hva hver metode er, hvordan den fungerer, og hvor den kommer fra.

Åpne data (CC-BY)

Oppdag

  • Bibliotek
  • Søk i metoder…
  • Bla etter fagfelt
  • Fagfelt
  • Reise
  • Sammenlign
  • Hvilken metode?

Referanse

  • Fagområder
  • Atlas
  • Ordliste
  • Metodikk
  • Filosofi

Arbeidsområde

  • Mitt bibliotek
  • Pulten
  • Chat

Selskap

  • Om
  • Priser
  • Kontakt
  • Foreslå en metode

Oppføringene er sammenstilt fra publiserte kilder til referansebruk. Å kontrollere at informasjonen er korrekt og egnet for ditt eget bruk, er fremdeles ditt eget ansvar.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Et oppslagsbibliotek for forskningsmetoder
  • Personvern
  • Informasjonskapsler
  • Vilkår
  • Slett konto