Iowa Gambling Task
The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) is a laboratory analog of real-world decision-making that measures how individuals make risky choices when outcomes are uncertain. Participants select cards from four decks, each offering different patterns of rewards and losses. The task reveals whether participants learn from experience to prefer advantageous decks (smaller immediate gains, fewer losses) over disadvantageous ones (larger gains, greater long-term losses). The IGT has been instrumental in understanding decision-making deficits in brain injury, addiction, and psychiatric conditions.
Kilderegister
Siteringer kopiert ordrett fra metodens kilderegister. Ingen påstandsnivåverifisering er underforstått fra dem.
- Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50(1-3), 7-15. · DOI 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3
- Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275(5304), 1293-1295. · DOI 10.1126/science.275.5304.1293
- Worthy, D. A., Hawkins, G. E., & Swinburne Romine, R. (2013). Older adults show a bias towards choosing familiar decks in the Iowa Gambling Task. Experimental Aging Research, 39(4), 466-480. · URL
Kuraterte påstander
Påstander lagret i bevishovedboken, hver med sin egen vurdering.
Denne visningen finner ikke opp en påstandsvurdering når hovedboken ikke har noen.
Relaterte metoder
Generert fra metodegrafen og vist som maskinforslåtte relasjoner – ingen bevispåstand er underforstått.
Den genererte relasjonsgrafen har ingen utgående relasjon for denne metoden.