Gå til innholdScholarGate
BibliotekMitt bibliotekPultenReview StudioAssistent
Logg inn
Gamma-Gamma Spend Model/Bevis
Metodebevisregister

Gamma-Gamma Spend Model

The Gamma-Gamma model of monetary value is the standard companion to buy-till-you-die transaction models, estimating how much a customer spends per transaction so that purchase-count forecasts can be turned into monetary customer lifetime value. Formalized by Peter Fader and Bruce Hardie in a widely cited technical note, it assumes that each customer's individual transactions vary around their own average spend according to a gamma distribution, and that these per-customer average-spend levels themselves vary across the population according to a second gamma distribution, giving the model its name. A central assumption is that a customer's monetary value is independent of their transaction frequency, which lets the spend model be estimated and combined separately from a frequency model such as BG/NBD or Pareto/NBD. The model produces, for each customer, a Bayesian estimate of expected spend that shrinks a customer's noisy observed average toward the population mean, with more shrinkage for customers who have made fewer transactions. This guards against over-trusting the average order value of a customer seen only once or twice. The result feeds directly into the residual-lifetime-value calculation that powers customer-base analysis.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Kilderegister

Siteringer kopiert ordrett fra metodens kilderegister. Ingen påstandsnivåverifisering er underforstått fra dem.

Gamma-Gamma Model of Monetary Value
Taksonomisk metoderegister · regression-model / marketing
  • Fader, P. S., & Hardie, B. G. S. (2013). The Gamma-Gamma Model of Monetary Value. Technical note, www.brucehardie.com/notes/025/. · URL
  • Fader, P. S., Hardie, B. G. S., & Lee, K. L. (2005). "Counting Your Customers" the Easy Way: An Alternative to the Pareto/NBD Model. Marketing Science, 24(2), 275-284. · DOI 10.1287/mksc.1040.0098
Åpne full metode

Kuraterte påstander

Påstander lagret i bevishovedboken, hver med sin egen vurdering.

Ingen kuraterte påstander ennå

Denne visningen finner ikke opp en påstandsvurdering når hovedboken ikke har noen.

Relaterte metoder

Generert fra metodegrafen og vist som maskinforslåtte relasjoner – ingen bevispåstand er underforstått.

Same method familyBG/NBD Modelmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainCustomer Lifetime Valuemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyPareto/NBD Modelmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainRFM Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Bevisstatus

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Kilder

2 registrerte siteringer, kopiert fra metodens kilderegister.

Handlinger

Åpne metodeside
ScholarGate

Et innholdsfokusert oppslagsbibliotek for forskningsmetoder — hva hver metode er, hvordan den fungerer, og hvor den kommer fra.

Åpne data (CC-BY)

Oppdag

  • Bibliotek
  • Søk i metoder…
  • Bla etter fagfelt
  • Fagfelt
  • Reise
  • Sammenlign
  • Hvilken metode?

Referanse

  • Fagområder
  • Atlas
  • Ordliste
  • Metodikk
  • Filosofi

Arbeidsområde

  • Mitt bibliotek
  • Pulten
  • Chat

Selskap

  • Om
  • Priser
  • Kontakt
  • Foreslå en metode

Oppføringene er sammenstilt fra publiserte kilder til referansebruk. Å kontrollere at informasjonen er korrekt og egnet for ditt eget bruk, er fremdeles ditt eget ansvar.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Et oppslagsbibliotek for forskningsmetoder
  • Personvern
  • Informasjonskapsler
  • Vilkår
  • Slett konto