Gå til innholdScholarGate
BibliotekMitt bibliotekPultenReview StudioAssistent
Logg inn
Customer Equity Modeling/Bevis
Metodebevisregister

Customer Equity Modeling

Customer equity modeling treats a firm's customers as financial assets and defines the value of the firm's customer base as the sum of the discounted lifetime values of its current and future customers. The idea was crystallized by Robert Blattberg and John Deighton, who proposed managing marketing by the 'customer equity test,' asking of any initiative whether it will grow customer equity, and who showed how to balance spending between acquiring new customers and retaining existing ones. Roland Rust, Katherine Lemon and Valarie Zeithaml extended the framework into a strategic, driver-based model, decomposing customer equity into value equity (objective perceptions of quality, price and convenience), brand equity (subjective and emotional brand perceptions) and retention equity (the strength of the customer relationship and loyalty programs). Their 'Return on Marketing' approach links each marketing action through these drivers to brand-switching probabilities, to changes in lifetime value, and ultimately to the change in customer equity it produces, so competing strategies can be compared on projected financial return. Customer equity modeling thus connects customer-level analytics to firm-level valuation and budget allocation, providing a common currency for marketing decisions.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Kilderegister

Siteringer kopiert ordrett fra metodens kilderegister. Ingen påstandsnivåverifisering er underforstått fra dem.

Customer Equity Modeling (Value, Brand and Retention Equity)
Taksonomisk metoderegister · process-pipeline / marketing
  • Rust, R. T., Lemon, K. N., & Zeithaml, V. A. (2004). Return on Marketing: Using Customer Equity to Focus Marketing Strategy. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 109-127. · DOI 10.1509/jmkg.68.1.109.24030
  • Blattberg, R. C., & Deighton, J. (1996). Manage Marketing by the Customer Equity Test. Harvard Business Review, 74(4), 136-144. · URL
Åpne full metode

Kuraterte påstander

Påstander lagret i bevishovedboken, hver med sin egen vurdering.

Ingen kuraterte påstander ennå

Denne visningen finner ikke opp en påstandsvurdering når hovedboken ikke har noen.

Relaterte metoder

Generert fra metodegrafen og vist som maskinforslåtte relasjoner – ingen bevispåstand er underforstått.

Used in the same domainBG/NBD Modelmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyCustomer Lifetime Valuemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyRFM Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyShare of Wallet Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Bevisstatus

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Kilder

2 registrerte siteringer, kopiert fra metodens kilderegister.

Handlinger

Åpne metodeside
ScholarGate

Et innholdsfokusert oppslagsbibliotek for forskningsmetoder — hva hver metode er, hvordan den fungerer, og hvor den kommer fra.

Åpne data (CC-BY)

Oppdag

  • Bibliotek
  • Søk i metoder…
  • Bla etter fagfelt
  • Fagfelt
  • Reise
  • Sammenlign
  • Hvilken metode?

Referanse

  • Fagområder
  • Atlas
  • Ordliste
  • Metodikk
  • Filosofi

Arbeidsområde

  • Mitt bibliotek
  • Pulten
  • Chat

Selskap

  • Om
  • Priser
  • Kontakt
  • Foreslå en metode

Oppføringene er sammenstilt fra publiserte kilder til referansebruk. Å kontrollere at informasjonen er korrekt og egnet for ditt eget bruk, er fremdeles ditt eget ansvar.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Et oppslagsbibliotek for forskningsmetoder
  • Personvern
  • Informasjonskapsler
  • Vilkår
  • Slett konto