Gå til innholdScholarGate
BibliotekMitt bibliotekPultenReview StudioAssistent
Logg inn
Authentic Leadership Questionnaire/Bevis
Metodebevisregister

Authentic Leadership Questionnaire

The Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ) is the dominant instrument for measuring authentic leadership, a positive leadership construct developed in the mid-2000s by Bruce Avolio, William Gardner, Fred Luthans, and colleagues. Authentic leaders are defined as those who are deeply aware of their own values, transparent in their relationships, balanced in processing information, and guided by an internalized moral compass. Gardner and colleagues' 2005 self-based model in The Leadership Quarterly laid out how leader authenticity develops and shapes followers, and Walumbwa and colleagues' 2008 Journal of Management paper operationalized the construct as a four-dimension higher-order factor and validated the ALQ across samples in the United States and China. The questionnaire measures self-awareness, relational transparency, balanced processing, and internalized moral perspective, and links them to follower trust, citizenship behavior, satisfaction, and performance. It anchored the rapid rise of authentic-leadership research within the positive-organizational-behavior movement.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Kilderegister

Siteringer kopiert ordrett fra metodens kilderegister. Ingen påstandsnivåverifisering er underforstått fra dem.

Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (Self-Awareness, Relational Transparency, Balanced Processing, Internalized Moral Perspective)
Taksonomisk metoderegister · latent-structure / organizational-behavior
  • Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126. · DOI 10.1177/0149206307308913
  • Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., & Walumbwa, F. (2005). Can you see the real me? A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 343-372. · DOI 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.003
Åpne full metode

Kuraterte påstander

Påstander lagret i bevishovedboken, hver med sin egen vurdering.

Ingen kuraterte påstander ennå

Denne visningen finner ikke opp en påstandsvurdering når hovedboken ikke har noen.

Relaterte metoder

Generert fra metodegrafen og vist som maskinforslåtte relasjoner – ingen bevispåstand er underforstått.

Same method familyEmpowering Leadership Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainEthical Leadership Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainTransformational Leadership Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Bevisstatus

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Kilder

2 registrerte siteringer, kopiert fra metodens kilderegister.

Handlinger

Åpne metodeside
ScholarGate

Et innholdsfokusert oppslagsbibliotek for forskningsmetoder — hva hver metode er, hvordan den fungerer, og hvor den kommer fra.

Åpne data (CC-BY)

Oppdag

  • Bibliotek
  • Søk i metoder…
  • Bla etter fagfelt
  • Fagfelt
  • Reise
  • Sammenlign
  • Hvilken metode?

Referanse

  • Fagområder
  • Atlas
  • Ordliste
  • Metodikk
  • Filosofi

Arbeidsområde

  • Mitt bibliotek
  • Pulten
  • Chat

Selskap

  • Om
  • Priser
  • Kontakt
  • Foreslå en metode

Oppføringene er sammenstilt fra publiserte kilder til referansebruk. Å kontrollere at informasjonen er korrekt og egnet for ditt eget bruk, er fremdeles ditt eget ansvar.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Et oppslagsbibliotek for forskningsmetoder
  • Personvern
  • Informasjonskapsler
  • Vilkår
  • Slett konto