Methodenbewijsdossier

Predatory Journals and Publishers

Predatory journals are fake academic publishers that exploit the open-access model by charging authors publication fees without providing peer review, editorial oversight, or quality control. Coined by librarian Jeffrey Beall in 2010, the term describes publishers that prioritize profit over scientific integrity, accepting nearly all submissions (regardless of quality), using deceptive marketing (claiming high impact factors, faking indexing, using names similar to established journals), and often hosting work that would not survive peer review. Publishing in predatory journals damages an author's credibility and wastes research dissemination efforts.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bronrecord

Citaten letterlijk overgenomen uit het bronrecord van de methode. Hieruit wordt geen verificatie op claimniveau afgeleid.

Identification and Avoidance of Predatory Journals and Publishers

Taxonomisch methodendossier · process-pipeline / publication-ethics

Volledige methode openen

Gecureerde claims

Claims opgeslagen in het bewijsregister, elk met zijn eigen beoordeling.

Nog geen gecureerde claims

Deze weergave verzint geen claimbeoordeling als het register er geen heeft.

Gerelateerde methoden

Gegenereerd uit de methodegraaf en getoond als machinaal voorgestelde relaties — er wordt geen bewijsclaim afgeleid.

Same method familyArticle Retraction Processmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyCOPE Guidelines for Publication Ethicsmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyOpen Access Publishing Modelsmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyPeer Review Processmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.