ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineCritical disability studies / discourse analysis

Disability Critical Discourse Analysis

Disability critical discourse analysis applies the tools of critical discourse analysis (CDA) to disability, treating disability as a phenomenon that is constructed in and through language. Set out systematically in Jan Grue's 2015 book Disability and Discourse Analysis, the method brings together disability studies and CDA to examine how texts and talk — in media, politics, clinical settings, and everyday life — construe disability, position disabled people, and naturalize particular understandings (deficit, tragedy, rights) through specific linguistic choices. Its distinctive claim is that the language used to talk about disability is not a neutral description of a prior reality but part of how disability is socially produced and contested.

Openen in MethodMindBinnenkortToepassen, vergelijken, advies krijgen
Tools & bronnen
Dia's downloaden
Leren & verkennen
VideoBinnenkort

Lees de volledige methode

Alleen voor leden

Log in met een gratis account om dit onderdeel te lezen.

Inloggen

Methodenkaart

De omgeving van verwante methoden — selecteer een knooppunt om te verkennen.

Bronnen

  1. Grue, J. (2015). Disability and Discourse Analysis (Interdisciplinary Disability Studies). Farnham: Ashgate. ISBN: 9781472432926

Deze pagina citeren

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Disability Critical Discourse Analysis (Disability & Discourse Analysis). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/nl/disability-studies/disability-critical-discourse-analysis

Welke methode?

Plaats deze methode naast haar naaste verwanten en lees ze naast elkaar — de bibliotheek legt de boeken op tafel; de keuze is aan u.

Naast elkaar vergelijken

Geciteerd door

ScholarGateDisability Critical Discourse Analysis (Disability Critical Discourse Analysis (Disability & Discourse Analysis)). Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-24 via https://scholargate.app/nl/disability-studies/disability-critical-discourse-analysis · Gegevensset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026