Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Gewogen systematische steekproeftrekking× | Gewogen Steekproeftrekking× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Surveymethodologie | Surveymethodologie |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | Mid-20th century (1950s-1970s) | 1940s–1952 (formalized in large-scale government survey work and the Horvitz-Thompson estimator) |
| Grondlegger≠ | William G. Cochran (systematic and weighted probability sampling theory) | Morris H. Hansen, William N. Hurwitz; D. G. Horvitz and D. J. Thompson (theoretical framework) |
| Type≠ | Probability sampling technique | Probability sampling design |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-0471162407 | Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0471162407 |
| Aliassen≠ | systematic sampling with weights, probability-weighted systematic sampling, systematic PPS sampling | probability proportional to size sampling, PPS sampling, unequal probability sampling, importance sampling |
| Verwant≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Weighted systematic sampling selects units at equal spacing along a cumulative-weight axis rather than along a simple list index. By ordering the population and accumulating auxiliary size or importance weights before applying a fixed sampling interval, it combines the operational simplicity of systematic sampling with the efficiency gains of probability-proportional-to-size selection — giving larger or more important units a higher probability of inclusion while still visiting every part of the ordered frame. | Weighted sampling is a probability-based design in which units are selected with unequal probabilities proportional to a known auxiliary measure of size or importance. Sampling weights — the inverse of inclusion probabilities — are applied during analysis so that each sampled unit correctly represents the population units it stands for. The approach underpins large-scale government, health, and social surveys where simple random sampling would be inefficient. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|