ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

UTA*×CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method)×
VakgebiedBesluitvormingBesluitvorming
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Jaar van ontstaan19852016
GrondleggerSiskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D.Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
TypeAdditive utility disaggregation — LP from ordinal reference judgementsRelative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
Oorspronkelijke bronSiskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. (1985). UTASTAR: An ordinal regression method for building additive value functions. Investigación Operativa link ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
Aliassen
Verwant88
SamenvattingUTASTAR (UTA* — Additive utility disaggregation from reference ranking (revised UTA)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Siskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. in 1985. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: UTASTAR · CILOS. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-18 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare