Methoden vergelijken

	Statistische rapportagestandaarden: Transparante rapportage van analyses	IMRaD-structuur: Introductie, Methoden, Resultaten en Discussie
Vakgebied	Academisch schrijven	Academisch schrijven
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan	2005	1970
Grondlegger	Statistical and methodological literature; emphasized by Cumming (2013), ICMJE, and replication crisis discussions	International scientific publishing community (adopted widely by 1970s)
Type	Guideline	Guideline
Oorspronkelijke bron	Cumming, G. (2013). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25(1), 7–29.	International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2023). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals.
Aliassen	reporting statistics, statistical transparency, effect size reporting	IMRaD, IMRAD, scientific manuscript structure
Verwant	4	5
Samenvatting	Transparent reporting of statistical results—including effect sizes, confidence intervals, p-values, and assumptions—is essential for scientific integrity and reproducibility. Many published studies report p-values in isolation without effect sizes or confidence intervals, making it impossible for readers to assess the magnitude of findings. Statistical reporting standards, emphasized by Cumming (2013), the American Statistical Association, and the ICMJE, require effect sizes, confidence intervals, and discussion of uncertainty. This enables readers to judge whether findings are practically significant (not just statistically significant) and to compare effect sizes across studies in meta-analyses. Poor statistical reporting wastes research and prevents proper synthesis of evidence.	IMRaD is the standard organizational framework for scientific manuscripts in biomedical and natural sciences research. It separates reporting into four sequential sections—Introduction (why the research was conducted), Methods (how it was done), Results (what was found), and Discussion (what the findings mean)—enabling readers to understand, evaluate, and reproduce the work. Adopted as best practice by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) since the 1970s, IMRaD structure is now mandated or strongly recommended by most peer-reviewed journals.