Methoden vergelijken

	Gevoeligheidsanalyse met Six Sigma DMAIC	Six Sigma DMAIC
Vakgebied	Experimenteel ontwerp	Kwaliteitsmanagement
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan	2000s–2010s (applied integration era)	2014
Grondlegger	Integration of Six Sigma DMAIC (Motorola / Mikel Harry, 1980s–2000) with sensitivity analysis techniques (Saltelli et al., 1990s–2000s)	Motorola; Pyzdek & Keller
Type	Hybrid process-improvement and uncertainty-quantification pipeline	Structured process improvement methodology
Oorspronkelijke bron	Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D., Saisana, M., & Tarantola, S. (2008). Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer. Wiley. ISBN: 978-0470059975	Pyzdek, T., & Keller, P. (2014). The Six Sigma Handbook (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0-07-184053-9
Aliassen	SA-DMAIC, DMAIC sensitivity analysis, sensitivity-informed Six Sigma, Six Sigma sensitivity integration	DMAIC Framework, Six Sigma Process Improvement Cycle, Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control, Altı Sigma DMAIC
Verwant	5	3
Samenvatting	Sensitivity analysis integrated with Six Sigma DMAIC augments the classic Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control cycle with formal quantification of how much each input variable contributes to output variation. By embedding local or global sensitivity indices inside the Analyze phase, practitioners move beyond correlation screening to rigorously rank which process factors drive defect rates, guiding improvement resources to where they matter most.	Six Sigma DMAIC is a data-driven, five-phase process improvement methodology — Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control — used to reduce defects and process variation to fewer than 3.4 defects per million opportunities. Originating at Motorola in the 1980s and systematized by practitioners including Pyzdek and Keller, it is widely adopted in manufacturing, healthcare, finance, and service industries seeking sustained quality gains.