ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

SAPROF: Gestructureerde Beoordeling van Beschermende Factoren voor Geweldsrisico×VRAG: Violence Risk Appraisal Guide×
VakgebiedForensische psychologieForensische psychologie
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan20121993
GrondleggerVivienne de Vogel, Corine de Ruiter, Yvonne Bouman, Merike de Vries RobbéGrant T. Harris, Marnie E. Rice, Vernon L. Quinsey
TypeClinician-ratedClinician-rated / File-based
Oorspronkelijke bronde Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2012). SAPROF: Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (Version 3). Forum Educatief. link ↗Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology, 6(4), 269–279. DOI ↗
AliassenSAPROF, de Vogel SAPROFVRAG, Harris-Rice-Quinsey VRAG
Verwant44
SamenvattingThe Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk (SAPROF) is a 17-item structured professional judgment tool developed by de Vogel, de Ruiter, Bouman, and colleagues (2012) to identify protective factors and strengths in individuals undergoing violence risk assessment. It complements risk assessment instruments (e.g., HCR-20v3) by systematically evaluating resilience, social support, motivation, and positive functioning—domains that mitigate violence risk and inform rehabilitation potential.The Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) is an actuarial instrument developed by Harris, Rice, and Quinsey (1993) to estimate the probability of violent recidivism among adult male offenders released from forensic psychiatric hospitals. It represents one of the earliest empirically validated violence prediction tools and remains widely used in correctional, forensic psychiatric, and civil commitment settings. The VRAG combines static historical variables with dynamic factors to generate a probability-based risk assessment.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: SAPROF · VRAG. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-19 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare