ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Rough-MABAC×CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation×
VakgebiedBesluitvormingBesluitvorming
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Jaar van ontstaan20191995
GrondleggerJia, F., Liu, Y., Wang, X.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TypeIF-Rough outranking/ranking — Intuitionistic Fuzzy Rough Number (membership μ, non-membership ν)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Oorspronkelijke bronJia, F., Liu, Y., Wang, X. (2019). An extended MABAC method for multi-criteria group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy rough numbers. Expert Systems with Applications DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Aliassen
Verwant88
SamenvattingROUGH-MABAC (Rough-MABAC — Rough extension of MABAC) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Jia, F., Liu, Y., Wang, X. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: ROUGH-MABAC · CRITIC. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-17 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare