ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Robuust Verklarend Onderzoek×Hypothesetoetsend onderzoek×
VakgebiedOnderzoeksontwerpOnderzoeksontwerp
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan1960s–1980s (robust statistics foundations); applied to explanatory research from 1990s onwardEarly 20th century (Fisher 1925; Neyman–Pearson 1933)
GrondleggerPeter J. Huber (robust statistics); applied to explanatory designs via Rand Wilcox and othersKarl Pearson, Ronald A. Fisher, Jerzy Neyman, Egon Pearson
TypeQuantitative research designQuantitative confirmatory research design
Oorspronkelijke bronHuber, P. J. (1981). Robust Statistics. Wiley. ISBN: 978-0471418054Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (1986). Foundations of Behavioral Research (3rd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 978-0030417603
Aliassenrobust causal research, outlier-resistant explanatory design, robust regression-based explanatory studyhypothetico-deductive research, confirmatory quantitative research, null hypothesis significance testing, NHST design
Verwant44
SamenvattingRobust explanatory research combines the explanatory goal of identifying why and how variables causally influence one another with robust statistical methods that remain valid when data violate classical assumptions — particularly normality, homoscedasticity, and the absence of influential outliers. Rather than discarding outliers or forcing data to conform to ordinary least squares assumptions, this design applies estimators and inferential procedures that down-weight or resist the distorting influence of extreme observations while preserving the explanatory aim of the study.Hypothesis testing research is a quantitative design in which the investigator derives one or more explicit, falsifiable propositions from theory, translates them into a null hypothesis (H0) and an alternative hypothesis (H1), collects empirical data, and then applies an inferential statistical test to decide whether the evidence is sufficient to reject H0. The approach is the dominant paradigm for confirmatory science across the social, behavioral, health, and natural sciences.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: Robust Explanatory Research · Hypothesis Testing Research. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-18 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare