Methoden vergelijken

	Robuuste differentiële itemfunctionering (Robuuste DIF)	Testen van Meetinvariantie
Vakgebied	Psychometrie	Psychometrie
Familie	Latent structure	Latent structure
Jaar van ontstaan	1990s–2000s	2000
Grondlegger	Building on DIF work by Cleary & Hilton (1968) and Mantel-Haenszel by Holland & Thayer (1988); robust extensions developed through 1990s–2000s	Vandenberg & Lance
Type	Item bias / fairness analysis	Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis procedure
Oorspronkelijke bron	Magis, D., Beland, S., Tuerlinckx, F., & De Boeck, P. (2011). A general framework and an R package for the detection of dichotomous differential item functioning. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 847–862.	Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70.
Aliassen	Robust DIF, outlier-resistant DIF detection, robust item bias analysis, DIF with robust estimation	Factorial Invariance, Measurement Equivalence, Configural-Metric-Scalar Testing, Ölçüm Değişmezliği
Verwant	6	3
Samenvatting	Robust differential item functioning analysis detects items that behave differently across demographic groups after matching respondents on the underlying trait, while protecting the procedure against distortion by outliers, model misfit, or contaminated anchor items. It is applied in educational testing, clinical assessment, and survey research to ensure that a scale measures the same construct equally fairly for all groups.	Measurement invariance testing is a sequence of nested confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models that examines whether a psychological scale measures the same latent construct in the same way across distinct groups or time points. Systematized and popularized by Vandenberg and Lance (2000), the procedure tests a hierarchy of constraints — from identical factor patterns to identical item intercepts — so that researchers can justify meaningful group comparisons on latent means.