Methoden vergelijken

	Geregulariseerde Boosting	Robuuste Gradient Boosting
Vakgebied	Machine learning	Machine learning
Familie	Machine learning	Machine learning
Jaar van ontstaan	2001–2016	2001
Grondlegger	Friedman, J. H.; extended by Chen & Guestrin	Friedman, J. H. (with Huber loss from Huber, P. J.)
Type	Regularized ensemble (boosting with shrinkage/penalty)	Ensemble (boosted trees with robust loss)
Oorspronkelijke bron	Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 29(5), 1189–1232.	Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 29(5), 1189–1232.
Aliassen	shrinkage boosting, penalized boosting, regularized gradient boosting, L1/L2 boosting	gradient boosting with Huber loss, robust GBM, outlier-robust boosting, robust gradient-boosted trees
Verwant	5	6
Samenvatting	Regularized boosting extends gradient boosting by adding explicit controls — shrinkage (learning rate), L1/L2 weight penalties, subsampling, and tree-complexity limits — to the objective function and the update rule. These constraints reduce overfitting, stabilise the model on noisy or small datasets, and are the core reason why systems such as XGBoost and LightGBM consistently outperform vanilla boosting on real-world tabular benchmarks.	Robust Gradient Boosting is gradient boosting trained with outlier-resistant loss functions — most commonly the Huber loss or quantile (pinball) loss — instead of squared-error loss. Proposed in Friedman's seminal 2001 paper, this variant produces predictions far less distorted by extreme values or contaminated labels, while retaining the full predictive power of gradient-boosted trees.