Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Kwalitatief-dominante transformatieve mixed methods design× | Embedded Transformative Mixed Methods× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Onderzoeksontwerp | Onderzoeksontwerp |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan | 2003–2010 | 2003–2010 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Donna M. Mertens (transformative framework); John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (weighting typology) | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (embedded design); Donna M. Mertens (transformative framework) |
| Type | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative Research and Evaluation. Guilford Press. ISBN: 978-1593856267 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| Aliassen≠ | QUAL-dominant transformative MMR, qualitative-priority transformative design, QUAL+ transformative mixed methods, transformative mixed methods with qualitative priority | transformative embedded design, embedded mixed methods with transformative framework, transformative nested mixed methods |
| Verwant≠ | 6 | 2 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Qualitative-dominant transformative mixed methods is a mixed methods research design in which qualitative data carry the primary evidential weight while quantitative data serve a supplementary role, and the entire inquiry is governed by a transformative theoretical framework — one committed to social justice, equity, and the amplification of marginalized voices. The design produces rich contextual understanding alongside statistical corroboration to advance emancipatory or advocacy-oriented goals. | Embedded transformative mixed methods is a research design that nests one type of data (quantitative or qualitative) inside a dominant dataset of the other type, with both strands guided by an overarching transformative framework — such as feminist, disability rights, or social justice theory. The design serves research questions where statistical breadth and in-depth qualitative insight must both speak directly to equity, empowerment, or systemic change goals. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|