ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Z-toets voor twee proporties×Sign Test×
VakgebiedStatistiekStatistiek
FamilieHypothesis testHypothesis test
Jaar van ontstaan19001946
GrondleggerKarl Pearson / classical large-sample z approximationW. J. Dixon & A. M. Mood
TypeParametric proportion comparisonNonparametric median test
Oorspronkelijke bronFleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003). Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions (3rd ed.). Wiley. DOI ↗Dixon, W. J. & Mood, A. M. (1946). The statistical sign test. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 41(236), 557–566. DOI ↗
Aliassenz-test for proportions, two-sample proportion test, one-proportion z-test, Oran Testi — z Testi (Oranlar)İşaret Testi (Sign Test), one-sample sign test, paired sign test
Verwant44
SamenvattingThe proportion test (z-test for proportions) is a parametric hypothesis test that compares one or two sample proportions against a reference value or each other. Grounded in the large-sample normal approximation formalized by Fleiss, Levin, and Paik (2003), it is the standard tool for binary outcome comparisons when samples are large enough for the central limit theorem to apply.The sign test is the simplest nonparametric hypothesis test for deciding whether the median of paired differences — or of a single sample — differs significantly from a hypothesised value. Formalised by W. J. Dixon and A. M. Mood in 1946, it imposes virtually no distributional assumptions and can be applied to any data where individual differences can be classified as positive or negative.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: Proportion Test · Sign Test. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-17 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare