Methoden vergelijken

	Post-Disaster Needs Assessment	Build Back Better Recovery Evaluation
Vakgebied	Disaster Studies	Disaster Studies
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan	2008	2014
Grondlegger	European Union, World Bank (GFDRR) & United Nations Development Group	Sandeeka Mannakkara, Suzanne Wilkinson & Regan Potangaroa
Type	Harmonized post-event assessment pipeline for damage, loss, and recovery needs	Principle-based evaluation framework for resilient post-disaster recovery
Oorspronkelijke bron	GFDRR, European Union, United Nations Development Group (2013). Post-Disaster Needs Assessments Guidelines, Volume A. Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery, World Bank.	Mannakkara, S., Wilkinson, S., & Potangaroa, R. (2014). Build back better: implementation in Victorian bushfire reconstruction. Disasters, 38(2), 267-290.
Aliassen	PDNA, Damage, Loss and Needs Assessment, Post-Disaster Damage and Loss Assessment	BBB Evaluation, Build Back Better Assessment, Resilient Recovery Evaluation
Verwant	3	3
Samenvatting	The Post-Disaster Needs Assessment (PDNA) is a harmonized, government-led methodology for quantifying the effects of a disaster and costing a recovery program. Agreed in 2008 by the European Union, the World Bank (through GFDRR), and the United Nations Development Group, and codified in the PDNA Guidelines, it fuses two traditions: the ECLAC damage-and-loss accounting (DaLA), which values destroyed assets and the economic flows foregone during recovery, and a human-and-recovery-needs assessment, which captures impacts on people's lives, livelihoods, and access to services. Conducted sector by sector against a pre-disaster baseline, a PDNA produces a single consolidated picture of total disaster effects and feeds a costed Recovery Framework that increasingly embeds build-back-better resilience, giving governments and donors a common basis for mobilizing and prioritizing recovery resources.	Build Back Better (BBB) recovery evaluation is a principle-based framework for assessing whether post-disaster reconstruction reduces future risk rather than merely restoring pre-disaster conditions. Formalized by Sandeeka Mannakkara, Suzanne Wilkinson, and Regan Potangaroa and demonstrated in the 2009 Victorian bushfire reconstruction, the framework organizes recovery around three categories: disaster risk reduction (safer structures and siting), community recovery (social and economic restoration), and effective implementation (stakeholder engagement, regulation, and monitoring). Under each category sit concrete principles against which a recovery effort is evaluated, comparing what was achieved with what resilient recovery requires and with the pre-disaster baseline. Endorsed within the Sendai Framework and embedded in post-disaster needs assessment, BBB evaluation turns the slogan 'build back better' into an auditable standard for resilient reconstruction.