ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Probabilistische Linguïstische uitbreiding van TOPSIS×CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation×
VakgebiedBesluitvormingBesluitvorming
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Jaar van ontstaan20191995
GrondleggerLu, J., Wei, C.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TypeProbabilistic Linguistic outranking/ranking — Probabilistic Linguistic Term Set (PLTS: {L_k|p_k})Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Oorspronkelijke bronLu, J., Wei, C. (2019). TOPSIS Method for Probabilistic Linguistic MAGDM with Entropy Weight and Its Application to Supplier Selection of New Agricultural Machinery Products. Entropy DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Aliassen
Verwant88
SamenvattingPL-TOPSIS (Probabilistic Linguistic extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Lu, J., Wei, C. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: PL-TOPSIS · CRITIC. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-18 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare