Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Participatieve Interpretatieve Fenomenologische Analyse× | Participatieve fenomenologie× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Kwalitatief | Kwalitatief |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 2000s–2010s | 1990s (converging streams: van Manen 1990; Heron & Reason 1997) |
| Grondlegger≠ | Jonathan A. Smith (IPA foundation); adapted by participatory researchers in disability, health, and education studies | John Heron and Peter Reason (participatory inquiry); Max van Manen (lifeworld phenomenology) |
| Type≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative research approach |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-1412908344 | Heron, J. (1996). Co-operative Inquiry: Research into the Human Condition. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803977366 |
| Aliassen | Participatory IPA, P-IPA, participatory phenomenological inquiry, collaborative IPA | collaborative phenomenology, participatory phenomenological inquiry, co-operative phenomenology, participatory lifeworld research |
| Verwant≠ | 5 | 3 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Participatory Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (Participatory IPA) merges the interpretive, meaning-focused rigour of IPA with participatory research principles, engaging participants as active co-researchers in the design, data collection, and analytic phases. The approach is especially valued in studies involving marginalised or vulnerable groups — such as people with cognitive impairments, chronic illness, or lived experience of social exclusion — where standard interview protocols may silence rather than amplify participant voice. | Participatory phenomenology combines the depth of phenomenological inquiry — attending to the lived structure of experience — with the democratic ethos of participatory research, in which those being studied become active co-researchers. Rather than treating participants as data sources, the approach positions them as collaborative investigators of their own experiential world, producing knowledge that is both phenomenologically rich and collectively validated. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|