Methoden vergelijken

	ORCID Onderzoeker-ID	Altmetrics en artikel-niveau statistieken	Referentiemanagers
Vakgebied	Onderzoeksvaardigheden	Onderzoeksvaardigheden	Onderzoeksvaardigheden
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan	2010 (founding); 2012 (launch)	2010 (concept manifesto); 2011 (Altmetric.com platform launch)	2001 (modern era, EndNoteWeb); 2006 (Mendeley); 2006 (Zotero)
Grondlegger	ORCID Inc., a non-profit founded in 2010 by Liz Haak and others	Jason Priem and the altmetrics community (2010)	Academic researchers and librarians; developed since 1980s
Type	Standard	Tool	Tool
Oorspronkelijke bron	Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learn. Publ., 25(4), 259–264.	Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/	Booth, A. (2012). Citation management tools. In R. Bosch & K. Winn (Eds.), Reference management and citation software. Library Technology Reports, 48(5), 12–18.
Aliassen	ORCID, researcher identifier, ORCID iD	altmetrics, article-level metrics, alternative impact metrics	reference manager, citation software, bibliographic management
Verwant	4	4	3
Samenvatting	ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) is a free, unique, persistent 16-digit identifier assigned to researchers that distinguishes them from others with the same or similar names. Launched in 2012 by ORCID Inc., a non-profit organization, the ORCID system addresses a critical problem in scholarly communication: name ambiguity. Millions of researchers worldwide share names (e.g., 'Smith, J.'). Without a unique identifier, citations and publications are difficult to attribute correctly, author H-indices are miscalculated, and researchers are credit for work they did not do. An ORCID iD is free, permanent, and owned by the researcher; it persists regardless of affiliation changes or career transitions.	Altmetrics (alternative metrics) measure the online attention and societal impact of research by tracking mentions in social media (Twitter), news outlets, policy documents, blogs, videos, and other online sources. Introduced formally in 2010 by Jason Priem and colleagues, altmetrics address limitations of citation-based assessment: citation counts accumulate slowly (taking years for impact to register), do not capture policy influence, and are biased toward certain fields (biomedicine receives more citations than social sciences). Altmetric.com, PlumX, and other platforms now provide real-time data on research reach, complementing traditional journal impact factors and H-indices. While altmetrics should not replace peer-reviewed citations for tenure and promotion, they offer valuable insight into public engagement with research.	Citation management tools are software applications that store, organize, and format bibliographic references. They allow researchers to import citations from databases and websites, annotate and tag articles, organize references by project, and automatically generate formatted in-text citations and bibliographies in multiple styles (APA, Vancouver, Chicago, Harvard). Popular tools include Zotero (free, open-source), Mendeley (Elsevier-owned, freemium), EndNote (commercial, Clarivate), and others. These tools are essential for managing the hundreds to thousands of references accumulate during a research career and for ensuring consistent, accurate citation formatting in academic writing.